i have already red it - and was attempting to think of something constructive to say , i hope this gets a follow up and investigation
one potential problem that leaps out is : was this a permanent install ?
the article SEEMs to imply that these bolts were installed in 2011
i use these bolts all the time [ well actually i use excaliburs and hiltis ] - but not for permanent installs -
i thought that was the entire point of them [ for caver climber use ] , ie : a small drill hole [ i use 10mms ] , retreavable , reusable [ 3 ~ 5 times ] , once removed only a 10mm hole remains that can be smeared with mud / grit
thats why i love em - no great hassle - and if the pitch isnt a goer - you can abandon it - leaving no gear behind - and minilmal trace
as they are galv / plated [ different mffrs are different spec ] - they should not - at least by my understanding be left in as a permanent because :
1 - electrolytic action between the bolt and the SS hanger
2 - corrosion from water in the hole [ worse in mines etc where acidity is a bigger problem ]
while i am aware that they are not individualy tested - or approved - there :
www.excaliburscrewbolts.com/index.php?op...rticle&id=5&Itemid=6
is the specs for what i use
i have always been happi usuing them as various industries go through hundreds of boxes a week - and abuse the hell out of them - with no paterns of defect induced failure
so - hears hoping that the investigation turns up a definitive cause of failure -
because the prospect of random batch defects scares the shiite out of me
any one want to buy a mixed box of used / new screwbolts - lol
but last word - like i say - they are a temporary solution to exploring - not a permanent anchor tool - or at least thats my philosophy